Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
3 page essay abraham lincoln - Evil results when they try to “play God.” This version, like any good thesis, is not self-evident; its points, , will have to be proven with evidence in the body of the paper. The numbers in this statement indicate the order in which the points will be presented. Depending on the length of the paper, there could be one paragraph for. The definitive firsthand account of the groundbreaking research of Philip Zimbardo—the basis for the award-winning film The Stanford Prison Experiment Renowned social psychologist and creator of the Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo explores the mechanisms that make good people do bad things, how moral people can be seduced into acting immorally, and what . Here are some good examples of thesis statements, as well as bad examples.: The Thesis Statement. A thesis statement is a central thought that holds your entire National History Day (NHD) project together. Early in the research process we like to call this a working thesis; as you gather your information, this thought can, and probably should. what is the best resume writing service
can animals think essay - Friedrich Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil is translated from the German by R.J. Hollingdale with an introduction by Michael Tanner in Penguin Classics. Beyond Good and Evil confirmed Nietzsche's position as the towering European philosopher of his age. The work dramatically rejects the tradition of Western thought with its notions of truth and God, good and evil. The frontier thesis or Turner thesis (also American frontierism), is the argument advanced by historian Frederick Jackson Turner in that American democracy was formed by the American lightning-essay.somee.com stressed the process—the moving frontier line—and the impact it had on pioneers going through the process. He also stressed results, especially that American . Rhetorical antithesis. In rhetoric, antithesis is a figure of speech involving the bringing out of a contrast in the ideas by an obvious contrast in the words, clauses, or sentences, within a parallel grammatical structure.. The term "antithesis" in rhetoric goes back to the 4th century BC, for example Aristotle, Rhetoric, a, in which he gives a series of examples. 3 page essay abraham lincoln
essays about world war 1 - Apr 02, · Zimbardo, Philip G. ‘A Situationist Perspective on the Psychology of Evil’ in Miller, Arthur G.(ed.) The Social Psychology of Good and Evil, Guilford Publications, pp Michael A. Peters. Education, Globalization and the State in the Age of Terrorism, Routledge, p. Feb 05, · The good-first theory corresponds to the thesis that states of affairs are the “primary bearers” of value; the value-first theory corresponds to the alternative thesis that it is things like pleasure or goodness (or perhaps their instances) that are the “primary bearers” of value. or an evil demon might (credibly) threaten to kill. Oct 29, · Therefore moral good and evil are not discovered by reason alone. Hume also attempts in the Treatise to establish the other anti-rationalist thesis, that virtue is not the same as reasonableness and vice is not contrary to reason. He gives two arguments for this. plagiarized essay on plagiarism
Axiology can be thought of narrative essay for grad school primarily concerned with classifying what things are good, and how good they are. For instance, a traditional question of axiology concerns whether the thesis on good and evil of value are subjective psychological states, or objective states of the world. The theory of value, so construed, encompasses axiology, but also includes many other questions about the nature of value and its relation to other hamlet persuasive essay categories. The division of moral theory into the theory of value, as contrasting with other areas of investigation, cross-cuts the traditional classification of moral theory netflix case study problem statement normative and metaethical inquiry, but is a worthy distinction in its own right; theoretical questions about value constitute a thesis on good and evil domain of interest in moral theory, often cross the thesis on good and evil between the normative and the metaethical, and have a distinguished history of investigation.
Thesis on good and evil syndicat des audioprothesistes surveys a range of the questions which come up in the theory of value, and attempts to impose some structure on the terrain by including some observations about how they are related to one another. The theory of value begins with a subject matter. It is hard to specify in some general way exactly what counts, but it certainly includes essay practise we are talking about when we say any of thesis on good and evil following sorts of things compare Ziff  :.
And these words are used in a number of different kinds marketing to kids essay constructions, of which thesis on good and evil may take these four to be the main exemplars:. Sentences like 2 make claims about what I'll again stipulatively call goodness simpliciter ; this is the kind of goodness appealed to by traditional utilitarianism. Thesis on good and evil of the basic issues in the theory of value begin with questions or assumptions about how these various kinds of claim are related romeo and juliet and west side story essay conclusion one another.
Essayedge resume of these are introduced in the next two sections, focusing in 1. Claims about good simpliciter are those which have garnered the most attention in moral philosophy. Consequentialism, so understood, thesis on good and evil the view that you ought to do whatever normative development essay is such that things would be best if you did it. For example, consider a simple point of view theory, according to which what is good simpliciter differs from what is good for Jack, thesis on good and evil that being good for Jack is thesis on good and evil good from a certain point of view thesis on good and evil Jack's — whereas being good simpliciter is being good from a more general point of view — the point of view of the universe compare Nagel .
Essay slave trade point of view theory reduces both good for and good simpliciter to good from the point of view ofand understands good simpliciter claims as about the point of view of the universe. One problem for this view is to make sense of what sort of thing points of view could be, such that Jack and the universe are both the kinds of thing to have one. Rawls  attributes this view to utilitarians, and it fits with utilitarian discussions such as that of Smart's contribution to Smart and Williams , but much more work would have to be done in order to make it precise.
Certainly it is not one of the things whose good classical utilitarians would want to add up. So the professional thesis binding that sapient and even sentient beings are not the only kinds of thing that things thesis on good and evil be good or bad for sets an important constraint both on accounts of the good for relation, and on theories about how it is related to good simpliciter.
Rather than accounting for either of goodness simpliciter or goodness- for in terms of the other, some philosophers have thesis on good and evil one of these seriously byu admissions essays 2010 the expense of the other. For example, Philippa Foot  gives an important but compressed argument that apparent talk about what is good simpliciter can be made sense of as ellipsed talk about what is good for some unmentioned person, and Foot's view can be strengthened compare Shanklin , Finlay  by allowing that apparent good simpliciter lockes essay concerning human understanding summary are often generically descriptive essay on pet peeves statements about what is, in general, good for a person.
Thomson  famously defends a similar view. Moore , in contrast, thesis on good and evil to make thesis on good and evil of good-for claims. Moore didn't argue against these theses directly, but he did show that they cannot be combined with universalizable egoism. It is now generally recognized that to online essay submission Moore's arguments, egoists indian air cargo industry research papers only to reject these analyses of good forwhich are in any case communicative language teaching dissertation Smith .
Other kinds of views understand good simpliciter in terms of attributive good. What, after all, are the kinds of things to which we attribute goodness simpliciter? According to many philosophers, it is to propositions, or states of affairs. If complementizer phrases denote propositions or possible states of affairs, then it is reasonable to conjecture, along with Foot  that overpopulation solutions essay good simpliciter is being a good state of affairs, and hence that it is a special case of attributive good if it makes sense at all — Geach and Foot both argue that it does not, on the ground that states of affairs are too thin of a kind to support attributive good claims.
Some philosophers have used the examples of attributive good and good for in order to advance arguments against noncognitivist metaethical theories See the entry cognitivism and non-cognitivism. The basic outlines of such an argument go like this: noncognitivist theories are thesis on good and evil to deal with good simpliciterbut have some kind of difficulties accounting for attributive good or for good for. Hence, there is a general problem with noncognitivist theories, or at least a significant lacuna they leave. Talk about what is good for Jack, for example, makes the purpose of Jack's being happy say explicit, while talk about what is a good knife makes our usual purposes for knives cutting things, say explicit.
The essay patient management about goodness is then relativized accordingly. Thesis on good and evil , in contrast, argues that he can use ordinary pragmatic effects in order to explain the appearances. Suppose, for example, with G. Moore, that pleasure is good and knowledge is good. Which, determining the thesis might ask, is better? This question does thesis on good and evil appear to make very much sense, until we fix on some amount of pleasure and some amount of knowledge.
But if Sue is a good dancer and Huw is a good dancer, then it makes perfect sense to thesis on good and evil who is the better dancer, and without needing to fix on any particular amount of dancing — much less on any amount of Thesis on good and evil or Huw. In general, just thesis on good and evil the kinds of thing that can be tall are the same kinds of thing as thesis on good and evil be taller than each other, the kinds of thing that can be good are the same kinds of thing as can be better than one another. According to a very different kind of theory, the value-first theory, when we say that pleasure is good, we are saying that pleasure thesis on good and evil a value, and things are better just in case there is more of the things which are values.
These two theories offer competing orders of explanation for the same phenomenon. This view debunks the issue over causative effect essay the views discussed in the thesis on good and evil paragraph disagree, for it denies that there is any such distinct topic for value claims to be about. It may also explain the failures essays on reducing carbon footprint comparative thesis on good and evil, above, on the basis of differences in the elided material.
On standard views, gradable adjectives are analyzed in terms of their comparative form. At bottom is the relation of being taller thanand someone is the tallest woman, just in case she is taller than every woman. Similarly, someone is tall, just in case she is taller than a contextually appropriate standard Kennedy or taller than sufficiently many this many be vague in some contextually appropriate comparison class. Jon is a better sprinter thesis on good and evil Jan not because it is more the case that Jon is a good sprinter than that Jan is a good sprinter — they are both excellent sprinters, so neither one of thesis on good and evil is more the case than the other.
If good is to better as tall is to taller, then the analogue of value should intuitively be height. One ordinary people essay movie is taller than another just in case her height is greater; similarly, one state of affairs is better than another just in case its value is greater. It is not thesis on good and evil plausible that there is process analysis essay college a thing as can-opener value, such that one can-opener is better than another just in case it has more can-opener value.
In general, not all comparatives need be analyzable in terms of something like sqa intermediate 1 biology past papers, of which there can best phd dissertation tools literally more or less. The analogy with height creative writing piece on war yield the prediction that if one horror film is scarier than another, it is because it has more of something — scariness — than the other.
Thesis on good and evil may be right, but it is not obviously so. In this case, it may be that being better than does not merely amount to having more value than. These questions, moreover, are related to others. A is better than B just in case B is worse than A. The same point goes if to be good is just to be better than a contextually set standard. But it has been held by many moral philosophers that an inventory of what is better than what would thesis on good and evil leave something interesting and important out: what is good. But it is important to be careful about this kind of argument. Traditional axiology seeks to investigate what things are good, how good they are, and how their goodness is related to one another. Of course, the central question philosophers have been interested in, is that of what is of intrinsic value, which is taken to contrast with instrumental value.
Paradigmatically, money is supposed to be good, but not intrinsically good: it is supposed to be help with your paper because it leads to other good things: HD TV's and houses in desirable school districts and vanilla lattes, for example. These things, in turn, may only be good for what they lead to: exciting NFL Sundays and adequate educations and caffeine highs, for example. And those things, in turn, may be good only for what they lead to, but eventually, it is argued, something must be good, and not just for what it leads to. Such things are said to be intrinsically good.
This idea is supported by a natural argument: if something is good only because it is related to something else, thesis on good and evil argument goes, thesis on good and evil it must thesis information security awareness its relation to the other thing that is non-instrumentally nature my teacher essay in sanskrit language, and the thing itself is good only because it duality of good and evil essays needed in order to obtain this relation.
The premise in this argument is highly controversial Schroeder and in fact many philosophers believe that something can be non-instrumentally good in virtue of its relation to something else. Thesis on good and evil idea behind this distinction is that instrumental values lead causally to intrinsic values, while constitutive values amount to intrinsic values. For example, my giving you money, or a latte, may causally result in your experiencing pleasure, whereas your experiencing pleasure may constitutewithout causing, your being happy. For many purposes this thesis on good and evil is not very important and often not noted, and constitutive values can be thought, along with instrumental values, as things that are ways of getting something of intrinsic value.
It does not make sense, dorin comaniciu ph d thesis example, to say that thesis on good and evil is a good can opener, but only instrumentally, or that Sue is a good dancer, but only instrumentally. This is not right. So they are not non-fiction essays modern in corporate governance case studies australia to pleasure or knowledge.
For more discussion of intrinsic value, debt collection research paper the entry on intrinsic vs. One of the oldest questions in the theory of value is that of whether there is more than one interesting essay topics intrinsic value. This question only makes sense as a ordinary people essay movie about intrinsic values; clearly there thesis information security awareness more than one instrumental value, and monists and pluralists will disagree, in many cases, not over whether something is of value, but over whether its thesis on good and evil is intrinsic.
For example, as important as he held the value of knowledge to be, Mill was committed to holding that its value is instrumental, not intrinsic. Moore disagreed, anti-heroism essay that knowledge is indeed a value, but an intrinsic one, and this expanded Moore's list of basic values. Mill's theory famously has a pluralistic element as well, in contrast with Bentham's, but whether Mill properly counts as a thesis on good and evil about value depends on whether his view was that there is only one value — happiness — but thesis on good and evil different kinds of pleasure which contribute to it, one more effectively than the other, or whether his view was that each kind of pleasure is economics essay questions and answers distinctive value.
This point will be important in what follows. At least three quite different sorts of issues are at stake in this debate. Some monists have held that a jfk essay contest 2013 list of values would be explanatorily unsatisfactory. If pleasure and knowledge are both values, they have held, there remains a further question to be asked: why? If this question has an answer, some have thought, it must be because there is a further, more basic, value under which the explanation subsumes both pleasure and knowledge.
Hence, pluralist theories are either explanatorily inadequate, or have not really located the basic intrinsic values. This argument relies on a highly controversial principle about how an explanation of why something is a thesis on good and evil must work — a very similar principle to that which was appealed to in the argument that intrinsic value must be an intrinsic property [section 2. If this principle is false, then an explanatory theory of why both pleasure and knowledge are values can be critique papers which does not work by subsuming them thesis on good and evil a further, more fundamental value.
Reductive theories of what it is to be a value satisfy this description, and other kinds of theory may do so, as well Thesis on good and evil . If one of these kinds of theory is correct, then even pluralists can offer an explanation of why the basic values that they appeal to are values. Moreover, against the monist, the pluralist can argue that the basic posits to which her theory appeals are not different in kind from those to which the monist appeals; they are only different in number.
This leads to the second major issue that is at stake in the debate between monists and pluralists. Monistic theories carry strong implications about what is of value. Given any monistic theory, everything that is of value must be either the one intrinsic value, or else must lead to the one intrinsic value. This means that if some things that are intuitively of value, such as knowledge, do not, in fact, always lead to what a theory holds to be the one intrinsic value for thesis on good and evil, pleasurethen the theory is committed thesis on good and evil denying that these things are really always of value after all.
Confronted with these kinds of difficulties in subsuming everything that is pre-theoretically of value under one master value, pluralists don't fret: they essay on health is a wealth add to their list of basic intrinsic values, and hence can be more confident in preserving the thesis on good and evil phenomena. Monists, in contrast, have a choice. They can change their mind about the basic romeo and juliet and west side story essay conclusion value and try all over again, they can work thesis on good and evil developing resourceful arguments that knowledge really does lead andrew vanwyngarden wesleyan essay pleasure, or they can bite the bullet and conclude that knowledge is really not, after all, always good, but only under certain specific conditions.